Medical Marijuana Is Becoming All About the Money …Less About the Care.

Let me share how I came to see the present medical marijuana business as “…all about the money”.

I’m a clinician and very interested in health information technology and how it may assist patients to improve care so I began to look at medical marijuana (MMJ) care with an eye to contributing to that care method. I also have to say I’m a sixties child and still full of that Love, Peace, and “people are basically good” approach to the world (thus my career as a caregiver).  I’m with a little IT company that helps patients track symptoms and the medical marijuana field seems to be an ideal place to help people in this regard. My company and I are unimportant to this article but where the field is going in respect to patients managing their treatment is important. My personal interests and background have helped me to frame an understanding of the cannabis care model. Here’s what we see…

In the medical marijuana field a patient has an evaluation (and if recommended) then purchases medication. In order to keep getting medication a person has to have an annual certification renewal. The docs get a buck, the dispensaries get a buck, and even the state gets a buck on the certification. So you got a condition and a medication – how is a patient supposed to manage treatment? Where’s that part of the care model fit in? Wasn’t someone supposed to have said something about that along the way?

In “mainstream medicine” an individual gets an evaluation (and if recommended) may get a medical intervention (like medication) but the patient will undergo some type of assessment of the interventions success later. If you’re in the medical field you would say, “that’s practicing real medicine”. That leaves it to reason that the cannabis care model is not considered legitimate medical practice by many. If you’ve been around medicine the last few decades you know that “evidence based medicine” (looking at the interventions results) is the norm and ethical practitioners ALWAYS assess their interventions. This makes MMJ look kind of, well funny.

In the medical marijuana care model there are three distinct, mutually exclusive, areas of involvement:

  • physicians manage evaluations
  • patients manage ongoing treatment or “follow up care”
  • dispensaries manage selling medication 

Why should patients needing help with multiple sclerosis, cancer, glaucoma,  pain management, or other illnesses be told, “we got ours…you’re on your own !”. Don’t the physicians and dispensaries feel any sense of partnership in the care model? Don’t the professionals owe it to the patient to get involved in the overall care model instead of concentrating solely on the profit side?

Should cannabis care be defined as more than the product, the physician, or the dispensary and more about the actual process of care? What sector is going to step up and help the sufferer find a way to manage treatment (right medication, right dose, right method of administration, strain, THC/CBD/CBN count, etc.). When you’re flopping around on a floor having a seizure or throwing your guts up these are a bit more important than just a recreational feature. You’re care is not a cookie cutter deal and you’re an individual with unique needs.

Why are these “mutually distinct groups” the care model for cannabis? Maybe it’s simply because the patients need for managing their care simply isn’t an area of interest to the other parties. Maybe it really is about the Almighty Dollar but maybe there’s more to it than that.

Physicians

Docs like to specialize – when they do they make more money. In MMJ this is very true. Is there anything wrong with wanting to operate in a specialty area of medicine? No. Is it a bad thing to be a diagnostician and not involved in subsequent care? No, again.  Do most cannabis physicians operate only in the MMJ field? Yes.

Regulatory authorities are struggling with the idea of treatment management and questioning whether it should be tied to the evaluating physician. This obligation hasn’t panned out because physicians in other areas of medicine are allowed to specialize in the same manner that cannabis physicians do. If physicians don’t help manage care are patients qualified to manage their own treatment? On a limited basis patients can manage their care but that’s not to say they don’t need meaningful consults from professionals like the cannabis physicians and “professionals” like the dispensary staffs are trying to be. Certainly no one expects a patient to travel too far into the “practicing medicine” area but to a limited degree patients can manage their well being reasonably well.

Is there a bit of trickery going on in the various state regulations when it comes to indicating the cannabis physicians should operate in a manner consistent with other areas of medicine and provide ongoing care? In my opinion I believe this may be the case because it takes us back to the “normal” way of practicing medicine “evidence based medical care” and I believe we’ll see a number of test cases where evaluating physicians are being prompted to provide ongoing care. (In some states follow up care is now mandated.) But this just takes us back to the “specializing in areas of medicine” paradigm and it’s really just an attempt to tie care to the evaluating physician. If a physician doesn’t really want to provide ongoing care he won’t.

If you want to know the answer to the question, “Does the doc really care about my well being?”…ask yourself this…did he REALLY steer you in the direction of specific, meaningful, and ongoing, care…or was it “try some acupuncture or yoga – and see you next year for the re-cert !”

But the docs aren’t the bad guys here. They’re just doing a job.

Dispensaries

Does your dispensary truly offer an array of ancillary services focused on your well being? Or, does the dispensary really just offer that one high dollar product? Check out Harborside Health Center in Oakland and see their commitment to their patients well being. They offer all kinds of ancillary services focused on patient’s well being. That’s a good model but it can be improved.

Dispensaries remind me of the plethora (yes, I actually used that word) of clothing boutiques which sprung up in the 1960’s (okay, I’m an old guy). Everyone just had to have a boutique, they were so cool, and so very hip. But most owners lost their businesses because they weren’t good business people – so perhaps we can forgive the dispensaries a bit because like the clothing boutiques they have a business to run and for many it’s new territory. For them the business is truly a bread and butter proposition and it’s not as if they took some kind of pledge to heal people or reduce people’s suffering.

A few months ago there were about 1285 dispensaries in Colorado now there are approximately 950. Do you think a few big money interests are getting together and forming chain dispensaries like in California? It’s just business folks.

And just trying to make a decent living doesn’t make you a bad guy either so the dispensaries are off the hook too.

Patients

Can consumers manage their care? Hasn’t that always been the bottom line reality anyway? Aren’t we forced to become our own advocates when we face our doctors in those 10-15 minute sessions? If you don’t speak up, you’re screwed. But where is the line for our competency as consumers?

Final rag, options for patients to manage their care will not appeal to businesses that are predominately concerned with helping people “score” legally. People who want to “get high” are NOT concerned about their well being or ongoing treatment. Businesses that wish to serve this type of customer will have no interest in legitimate treatment management options.  We all know the score on this issue.

So how do we create a workable cannabis care model?

Medical marijuana is a new, promising, and legitimate area of medicine. As a clinician I heartily believe it. As a human being I’m sold. It scared the pants off me to take a pipe and pot to my father in Texas when he was dying. Nauseated, and vomiting, the great man could have had some relief if only he could have gotten past the stigma and lit up. I was married to a wonderful woman who died of disabling asthma. I wish we’d known before the last year of her life that cannabis helped her breathe. She died when she was 44. They both deserved better medical options.

We need cannabis in the medical market and we need a decent model of care. We need the players to step up to the plate and do the right thing – get involved. Not because they have to, they don’t, but because it’s the right thing to do.

Ultimately it comes back to us, it’s our responsibility to look after ourselves. I hate to get all existential but you’re the one in charge – not just of your life but of your well being.

Now, go find the tools to take care of yourself. Look for good people to guide you. And along the way nag your doc and dispensary about helping you to manage your care. Try the guilt trip but remember to take your cash when you visit them.

Maybe Gordon Gecko was right, “It’s all about the money and the rest is conversation.”  

I hope not.

Enigami Blog 8-2-2012Copyright 2011 by Clifton D. Croan

3 thoughts on “Medical Marijuana Is Becoming All About the Money …Less About the Care.

  1. I enjoyed your article and will be looking for more.

    “Nothing dollarable is safe” John Muir

    Our health has become ‘dollarable’ and we are not doing well. When will the professionals getting the money display their stats of how good they really are?

    It is time to shine some light and bring accountability to the health care industry.The MMJ complex is a good place to start.

  2. Lоoking uр a сhirοpraсtoг’s name online and searching for reviews is a very effective way to gauge how satisfied his or her patients are. If you find some critical remarks, they may be justified, but also remember that many people are more inclined to post complaints than positive reviews. Likewise, people who have been cured of their neck pain by their chiropractor will be very happy to praise them. If you find a certain chiropractor has a large number of complaints and few supportive comments, it would probably be safer to look for someone else. Not all reviews, positive or negative, can be trusted, so you should read them and use your own best judgment about how seriously you should take them.

    • The research on patient satisfaction does not support statement #2. You will find a wealth of professional journal references regarding this at: http://www.annalsofpsychotherapy.com/articles/news/150/15/36-8-More-Thing-to-Come

      Patients are overwhelmingly accurate reporters which is why the US’s largest insurer, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), use patient satisfaction surveys. Private insurers of course follow suit though in as random a fashion as CMS. There are a lot of bogus healthcare grading systems out there. Check their statistical foundations for a real shocker!